Static sites are known for their simplicity and lack of dynamic components, making them inherently more secure than dynamic websites. Since static sites do not require a database or server-side scripting, they have a smaller attack surface and are less vulnerable to common web security threats such as SQL injection attacks and cross-site scripting. With less complexity in the codebase, there are fewer potential entry points for hackers to exploit, reducing the likelihood of security breaches. Furthermore, static sites do not rely on user input or external dependencies, making them less susceptible to security vulnerabilities that can arise from third-party plugins or integrations. By eliminating the need for constant updates and patches to address security issues in plugins or frameworks, static sites are able to maintain a more stable and secure environment for hosting content. This simplicity also allows for easier auditing and monitoring of the site's security, making it easier to detect and address potential threats. In addition, the lack of dynamic content on static sites means that there is less opportunity for malicious actors to inject harmful code or malware into the site. Without the need for server-side processing of user inputs, static sites are less vulnerable to attacks that exploit vulnerabilities in scripting languages or server configurations. By minimizing the potential points of entry for attackers, static sites provide a more secure platform for hosting content and protecting sensitive information.